Structural Comparison and Development Trend Analysis of Policy New Districts and Ordinary New Districts in Urban Renewal (Taking Qianhai and Xiongan as Examples)

Jingchen Zhang

doi:10.54254/2755-2721/2026.CH33116

Article Information

Received: 1 April 2026

Published: 28 April 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2026.CH33116

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Zhang,J. (2026). Structural Comparison and Development Trend Analysis of Policy New Districts and Ordinary New Districts in Urban Renewal (Taking Qianhai and Xiongan as Examples). Applied and Computational Engineering,237,8-13.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: ACE Vol.237

Part of Series: Applied and Computational Engineering

ISSN: 2755-2721 (Print) / 2755-273X (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Roberts P, Sykes H, Granger R. (2021) Urban regeneration. Routledge, London.

[2]Leary, M. E., & McCarthy, J. (2020). The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. Routledge, London.

[3]Zhuang Z, Ye L, Chen J. (2023) Urban renewal in China: policies, practices and challenges. Cities, 132: 104101.

[4]OECD. (2020) Cities in the World: A New Perspective on Urbanisation. OECD Publishing, Paris.

[5]Turok, I. (2021). Urban regeneration and the long-term performance of cities. Urban Studies, 58(2): 231–250.

[6]Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, et al. (2021) Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 230: 2753–2771.

[7]Sharifi A. (2021) Urban resilience assessment: mapping knowledge structure and trends. Sustainability, 13(11): 6306.

[8]Kwon Y, Kim H, Lee J. (2020). Institutional arrangements for urban regeneration governance: comparative lessons for large-scale redevelopment. Land Use Policy, 99: 104885.

[9]Zhang X, Chen S, de Jong M. (2022) City digital transformation and urban governance: a systematic review of smart city research. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79: 103708.

[10]Papa E, Bertolini L, te Brömmelstroet M. (2021) Transit-oriented development and sustainable urban regeneration: a review and research agenda. Journal of Transport Geography, 93: 103066.

[11]Lehmann S. (2021) Growing compact: urban form, density and sustainability in green city renewal. Sustainability, 13(4): 2172.

[12]Weber R. (2020) Selling city futures: the financialization of urban redevelopment policy. Urban Studies, 57(2): 284–302.

[13]Aalbers MB. (2020) Financialization. In: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Wiley, Hoboken.

[14]Chen J, Zhang L, Huang X. (2021) Land finance and local government debt in China: mechanisms and risks. Habitat International, 109: 102323.

[15]UN-Habitat. (2020) World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi.

[16]van den Berg M, Winden W. (2023) Innovation districts and urban renewal: governance, real estate and inclusive growth. Regional Studies, 57(6): 911–925.

[17]Bibri SE, Krogstie J. (2021) Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64: 102543.