A comparative study of large-scale and lightweight convolutional neural networks for ImageNet classification

Zepeng Zhao

doi:10.54254/2755-2721/47/20241236

Article Information

Received: 7 October 2023

Published: 15 March 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/47/20241236

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Zhao,Z. (2024). A comparative study of large-scale and lightweight convolutional neural networks for ImageNet classification. Applied and Computational Engineering,47,101-110.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: ACE Vol.47

Part of Series: Applied and Computational Engineering

ISSN: 2755-2721 (Print) / 2755-273X (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 1-9.

[2]Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.

[3]Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., et al. (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1-9.

[4]He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770-778.

[5]Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2818-2826.

[6]Iandola, F. N., Han, S., Moskewicz, M. W., Ashraf, K., Dally, W. J., & Keutzer, K. (2016). SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and< 0.5 MB model size. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360.

[7]Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., ... & Adam, H. (2017). Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.

[8]Tan, M., & Le, Q. (2019). Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, 6105-6114.

[9]Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L. J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009). Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 248-255.

[10]Image Classification on ImageNet. URL: https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet. Last Accessed: 2023/09/27.

[11]Bello, I., Fedus, W., Du, X., Cubuk, E. D., Srinivas, A., et al. (2021). Revisiting resnets: Improved training and scaling strategies. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 22614-22627.

[12]Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 7132-7141.

[13]Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 31(1), 4278-4284.

[14]Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H. T., & Sun, J. (2018). Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision, 116-131.